Now that we are slowly, I am more aware of what difficult it is to the art of dialogue.
televisions that some ideologue devised that met the triple role of inform, educate and entertain, have been lame in one of the three legs and the leg to distract them has become too long compared to the other leg that remains .
Form, which is said to be, are very little, or rather, nothing. Deformed. As for the question of the art of dialogue, we are rude, and you see those gatherings where they speak three at once and to break through and make good on their word each, up the decibels of her voice above other cronies. What I tell fellow members ...! Opponents, rivals, sometimes enemies cheeky!
I, too, when I was young, to assert that I was in legitimate possession of the floor, if someone stepped on the field based on talk at the same time, it also raised my decibels. Not now not now compete. That I begin to speak and 3 milliseconds after another comes contertulio and I cover my word to base to get more power, instantly silent and leave me for him just around the battlefield.
you not happened? In a conversation in a chat, you will speak and will cover another, go back to Inert, and the same as before or a different back cover you with his word. This phenomenon
compare him with a frying pan jacket in all eat the same container. How badly would that every time you go to put the spoon in the pan, you put one in front, bucket in hand, and will prevent over and over again, you came to the paella to get the spoon.
A battlefield is what today seem dialogues where two or more people talking wildly. No, not that the disorder that has to be attributed to the absence of moderator. In those gatherings where there is a moderator, does not help his presence. Moderators on television today are not like before, not moderate anything. Even they have nothing to moderate. Where will you stop! Formerly other moderators had moderated in the gatherings.
Now, the moderator of talk shows, has no mission but to send fulminant silence those who are shaping the hubbub and commotion, to say "let a few little minutes of advertising," that does not occur to us to use the remote control and those fools. Now, the moderators of the tele-and even those of the live chats, if any, are like the buttons on the hotel or bank, as the errand boy of the shop, like a gang of urchin agricultural workers, as the lad in a multitude of shepherds, as apprentice to a craftsman, like the fellow in a company.
What a shame! How se pierden las buenas costumbres!
Cuando yo era un chaval, de la tele lo aprendía casi todo. (Los que no hemos pasado por la universidad, la radio y la tele ha sido nuestro aula). Ahora ya no. Ahora desaprendemos porque los locutores, comunicadores, presentadores, periodistas (llámalos como quieras) nos están maleducando en el riquísimo lenguaje español; en el arte de dialogar…, ¡y en tantas cosas! Ahora que me fijo, en los tiempos que corren resulta desconcertante el hablaje de la gente de la tele. Es muy frecuente oírlos decir: “Pasaros y sentaros” “poneros detrás mía”. Cuando todo Everyone knows that if we want to educate the hablaje and re-do the tele this school that many had not, they should say: "Come in and sit down" "put behind me."
See? We are rude, make us doubt. What is the right thing "behind me" or "behind me"? What is the right thing, "against more llaméis, the more chance you have of winning" or "more llaméis, the more chance you have of winning?
I do not know, I noticed that the TVs of now I forgot how much and I'm uneducated. With the well-spoken that I was a kid!
deserve special mention those who do not listen, those who do a monologue dialogue: that of themselves. I only ask "subliminal language, which you keep your ears stiff, clean and well prepared to hear his important monologue. What you have to say is of little or no importance. Do not let you get a word and you plug your word every time you try.
What is the art of dialogue!
0 comments:
Post a Comment